<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.organicmatter.net">
<channel>
 <title>Organic Matter - Letters to the Editor</title>
 <link>http://www.organicmatter.net/taxonomy/term/29/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A New Category of Failure</title>
 <link>http://www.organicmatter.net/node/199</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Since I started blogging again, I've tried to revive Organic Matter without the wonkiness that used to characterize the site.  So far, if success were salsa, mine would best be described as 'mild.'  I even forgot to include a photo in my last post, not that I have one to illustrate any of the ideas I was writing about.  If YouTube, philosophy, and climate change have one thing in common, it's that they aren't very photogenic.  Anyway, I've created a &lt;a href="http://www.organicmatter.net/taxonomy/term/29"&gt;whole new category&lt;/a&gt; to describe the deepest fathoms of my failure.  And I intend to plumb these depths with &lt;i&gt;fervor&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This all happened because of a letter which I was compelled to write in response to an op-ed in my parents' hometown newspaper, &lt;a href="http://www.redding.com/"&gt;the Redding Record Searchlight&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href="http://www.redding.com/news/2007/dec/23/fire-and-brimstone-cant-cool-global-warming/"&gt;In his piece&lt;/a&gt;, Keith Ritter cites Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger's &lt;a href="http://www.thebreakthrough.org/breakthroughbook.shtml"&gt;new book&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Breakthrough&lt;/i&gt;, to restate and reargue the tired canard that "technology will save us."  His argument could very well be a corruption of Nordhaus and Shellenberger's these - I haven't read the book myself, and I'm hesitant to let Ritter put words in their mouths.  Like most of his ilk, he ignores economic realities, including entrenched subsidies for carbon-based fuels, and an utter lack of public funding for renewable energy development.  The point is, his piece so infuriated me that I couldn't keep myself from writing to the paper.  And &lt;ahref="http://www.redding.com/news/2007/dec/30/put-re-entry-facility-to-a-public-vote/"&gt;having been published&lt;/a&gt;, I likewise cannot keep myself from tooting my own horn on the Internet.  The text of my letter is after the fold, which is after a completely unrelated photograph.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/organicmatter/2003979863/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2083/2003979863_497fc802d7.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:40:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

